STAGES OF STRATEGIC AND PROJECT RISK MANAGEMENT FOR INITIATIVE PROJECTS

Authors

  • Victoria Bozhkova Doctor of Economics, Professor, Professor Business Economics and Administration Department at Sumy State Pedagogical University named after A.S. Makarenko https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1557-3819
  • Vladyslav Vozniesienskii PhD Student of the Department of Business Economics and Administration at Sumy State Pedagogical University named after A.S. Makarenko https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1696-3206

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31470/2786-6246-2025-11-6-13

Keywords:

initiative projects, strategic risks, project risks, management, sequence

Abstract

The article discusses the main stages of strategic and project risk management in the context of initiative projects. It is determined that effective risk management is a key success factor for projects implemented in conditions of uncertainty, limited resources, and rapid changes in the external environment. The key approaches to identifying, assessing, minimising and monitoring risks at each stage of their life cycle are analysed. The author proposes to use the procedure of indicative analysis as the basis for an objective assessment of the potential for realisation of the risks of failure to achieve national goals. According to the indicative method of analysis, the essence of the assessment of the potential for risks of failure to achieve national goals is carried out in the system of indicative indicators. At the strategic level of management, the risks that affect the achievement of national goals are managed, which can be designated as over-project risks, i.e. risks whose consequences may affect one or more projects (programmes) simultaneously.

The article proposes a scheme for planning impacts on strategic risks, indicating the stages and relevant instruments, and develops a register of strategic risks and a register of quantitative indicators of strategic risks. The register of strategic risks is divided into the following groups: 1) political risks; 2) economic risks; 3) social and health risks; 4) environmental, natural, man-made risks; 5) energy risks; 6) personnel risks; 7) scientific, technical and innovation risks; 8) infrastructure risks; 9) commercial risks; 10) information and cybersecurity risks.

The article emphasises the importance of an integrated approach to managing strategic and project risks, which allows for greater project flexibility, minimising the likelihood of negative scenarios, and identifying opportunities for process improvement in a timely manner. The results of the study may be useful for project managers, strategic managers, and risk managers in organisations seeking to improve their performance in the face of uncertainty and dynamic change.

References

Besner C., Hobbs B. (2012) An empirical identification of project management toolsets and a comparison among project types. Project Management Journal, vol. 43(5), pp. 24–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21292 [in English].

Dvir, D., Sadeh A., & Malach-Pines, A. (2006) Projects and project managers: The relationship between project managers’ personality, project types, and project success. Project Management Journal, vol. 37(5), pp. 36–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/875697280603700505 [in English].

Kerzner H. (2017) Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons [in English].

King C. (2022) How To Manage Marketing Projects Effectively? Ranktracker. Available at: https://www.ranktracker.com/ blog/how-to-manage-marketing-projects-effectively/ (accessed 17 May 2024) [in English].

Müller R., & Turner R. (2007) The influence of project managers on project success criteria and project success by type of project. European management journal, vol. 25(4), pp. 298–309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2007.06.003 [in English].

Project Management Institute. Available at: https://www.pmi.org/ (accessed 17 May 2024) [in English].

Shenhar A.J. (2001) One size does not fit all projects: Exploring classical contingency domains. Management science, vol. 47(3), pp. 394–414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.3.394.9772 [in English].

Shenhar A.J., Dvir D. (1996) Toward a typological theory of project management. Research policy, vol. 25(4), pp. 607–632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(95)00877-2 [in Ukrainian]

Turner J. Rodney (1999) The Handbook of Project-Based Management. Improving the Process for Achieving Strategic Objectives. McGraw-Hill Companies, London [in English].

What Is Marketing Project Management? Definitions, Phases, Steps, & How To Organize Your Projects (2022) СоSchedule. Available at: https://coschedule.com/marketing/marketing-management/marketing-project-management (accessed 17 May 2024) [in English].

Wheelwright S.C., & Clark K.B. (1992) Creating project plans to focus product development. Harvard Business School Pub, pp. 70–82 [in English].

Wysocki, R.K. (2011) Effective project management: traditional, agile, extreme. John Wiley & Sons [in English].

Shevchenko N.V., Davydenko M.V. (2017) Osoblyvosti realizatsii marketynhovykh proiektiv u systemi proiektnoho menedzhmentu [Features of marketing project implementation in the project management system]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Cherkaskoho derzhavnoho tekhnolohichnoho universytetu. Seriia: Ekonomichni nauky, vol. 47, pp. 41–47[in Ukrainian].

Holitsyn A.M. (2019) Upravlinnia marketynhovymy proiektamy yak stratehichna neobkhidnist rozvytku suchasnoho biznesu. [Marketing project management as a strategic necessity for modern business development]. Instytutsializatsiia yak faktor zabezpechennia rozvytku systemy investytsiino-innovatsiinoi bezpeky Ukrainy: kolektyvna monohrafiia [Institutionalization as a Factor in Ensuring the Development of the Investment and Innovation Security System of Ukraine: a collective monograph]. Zaporizhzhia: Vydavnychyi dim «Helvetyka», рр. 365–381[in Ukrainian].

Downloads

Published

2025-04-14

How to Cite

Bozhkova В., & Vozniesienskii В. (2025). STAGES OF STRATEGIC AND PROJECT RISK MANAGEMENT FOR INITIATIVE PROJECTS. Public Administration: Concepts, Paradigm, Development, Improvement, (11), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.31470/2786-6246-2025-11-6-13