ETHICAL DIMENSIONS OF THE PROCESS OF MAKING PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION DECISIONS DURING TIMES OF CRISIS

Abstract

The article substantiates the relevance of considering the ethical dimensions of public
administration in crisis situations. It notes that the process of making ethical decisions must include a
willingness to make choices based on moral values and ethical principles, taking into account the
complex context of the crisis.
The authors emphasize that in critical (limit) situations, the combination of a cognitive model for
decision-making with value dimensions of activity is crucial, blending evidence and values, and
heightened awareness of decision-makers regarding their responsibility.
It is highlighted that justified ethical decision-making can occur through a series of stages:
gathering facts; identifying the ethical issue; considering professional and organizational ethical
dimensions of the problem; identifying stakeholders; determining and evaluating options and their
consequences; making a decision. Each stage of ethical decision-making during periods of upheaval has
its own specifics and complexities in navigating.
The researchers point out that significant crises, such as wars, revolutions, and other substantial
social upheavals, place new emphasis on the interpretation of public administration principles and
restructure the hierarchy of those principles within its value system. An example is the state of martial law
in Ukraine, which necessitates certain justified restrictions on human and civil rights and freedoms, linked
to the need to ensure public safety and resist the enemy. The search for balance between freedom and
security is one of the most challenging issues faced by contemporary democratic societies, especially
those experiencing wartime conditions. It becomes a value dilemma for democracy in times of crisis.
The conclusion is drawn that in order to prepare public administrators for ethical decision-making in
crisis situations, it is necessary to: develop a specific algorithm/technology, ethical framework, and ensure
transparency and openness in the decision-making processes; balance the interests of different
stakeholders; analyze and reflect on the results and consequences of previous actions during a crisis;
create an ethical organizational culture that involves active discussion and search for answers to ethical
dilemmas; engage in continuous learning and foster the ability to make responsible decisions in uncertain
circumstances; actively interact with the expert community and consult ethical committees as needed.