EVALUATION AS A MECHANISM FOR MOTIVATING CIVIL SERVANTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31470/2786-6246-2026-16-96-105Keywords:
public administration, civil service, performance appraisal, civil servants’ motivation, organizational justice, competency-based approach, martial lawAbstract
The article examines the performance appraisal of civil servants as an instrument of
motivation, professional development, and strengthening the institutional capacity of public service. The
relevance of the topic is determined by the transformation of Ukraine’s public administration system,
European integration requirements, the need to enhance integrity, and the challenges of martial law,
which have significantly changed the conditions for performing official duties. It is substantiated that
appraisal should not be reduced to a formal HR procedure or administrative control mechanism, since it
directly affects employee engagement, professional responsibility, trust in leadership, and the quality of
public services. The study reveals the theoretical foundations of the relationship between appraisal and
motivation through the concepts of Public Service Motivation, Self-Determination Theory, the Job
Demands–Resources model, and organizational justice theory. It is argued that effective appraisal should
be based on transparent criteria, clear expected results, procedural fairness, constructive feedback, and a
real connection between assessment outcomes, remuneration, professional training, and career
advancement. Excessively formalized or punitive appraisal procedures may reduce intrinsic motivation,
weaken trust in HR processes, and cause the crowding-out of prosocial motives.
Particular attention is paid to the context of martial law, in which it is necessary to shift from
evaluating formal process compliance to assessing the public impact of civil servants’ activities. Such an
approach should consider the quality of administrative services, crisis-response capacity, support for
citizens, interagency cooperation, digital accessibility of services, and the contribution of civil servants to
the resilience of public administration. The generalization of international experience confirms the
importance of meritocracy, a competency-based approach, reduced managerial subjectivity, digitalization
of HR processes, and the development of a culture of trust. It is concluded that Ukraine needs a
developmental, fair, digitally supported, and socially result-oriented appraisal model.

